Why payment failures happen and how to fix them with Stripe analytics

Your checkout conversion dropped 3 percentage points last month. Traffic stayed constant. Product pages look fine. Add-to-cart rate is normal. But fewer customers complete payment. You check Stripe and see "payment declined" as the reason—but that generic message doesn’t explain whether the problem is customer error, your checkout implementation, overly aggressive fraud detection, or genuine payment issues beyond your control.

Payment failures cluster into fixable versus unavoidable categories. Customer has insufficient funds? Unavoidable—you can’t make money appear in their account. Customer typos card number and your form doesn’t validate it properly before submission? Completely fixable. Your fraud rules block 15% of legitimate customers thinking they’re fraudulent? Fixable. Customer’s bank declines international transactions automatically? Partly fixable through better payment routing.

Here’s the thing: most stores have no idea which category their failures fall into. They see "15% of payments fail" and assume that’s just normal e-commerce reality. Meanwhile, competitors with identical products and traffic convert 8-10 percentage points higher because they systematically identify and fix addressable payment failures. This guide shows exactly how to use Stripe analytics to diagnose why payments fail and which failures you can actually fix.

The three categories of payment failures

Understanding failure categories helps prioritize which problems to solve first.

Category 1: Customer-side issues you can’t fix (40-60% of failures)

Insufficient funds. Expired card customer forgot to update. Billing address customer typed incorrectly. These happen regardless of how good your checkout is. You can’t make customers have money or remember to update expired cards. Accept these as baseline failure rate—typically 5-8% of all payment attempts even with perfect checkout implementation.

Category 2: Technical implementation issues you can fix (20-40% of failures)

Checkout form doesn’t validate card numbers before submission, causing preventable declines. Mobile checkout layout makes typing difficult, increasing error rate. Slow payment processing times out before completing. Payment method integration configured incorrectly. These failures result from how you built checkout, not from customers or their banks. Every one is fixable through better implementation.

Category 3: Risk/fraud system issues you can adjust (10-30% of failures)

Fraud detection blocks legitimate customers. International transaction restrictions decline foreign cards unnecessarily. Velocity limits trigger when legitimate customers retry failed payments. 3D Secure authentication fails due to SMS delivery issues. These result from security systems being too conservative. Adjustable through rule tuning, though requires balancing fraud prevention against false positives.

The math matters: If 15% of payments fail and 60% of those failures are Category 1 (unavoidable), that’s 9% baseline. But 40% (Categories 2 and 3) represent fixable failures—that’s 6% of all payment attempts, potentially $50k-100k annual revenue for $1M revenue store. Worth fixing.

How to diagnose payment failures using Stripe analytics

Step 1: Identify overall failure rate and trend

Start with the big picture. Access Stripe’s payment analytics and review your success rate over the past 90 days. Look for patterns: Is success rate declining gradually? Stable but lower than you’d like? Recently dropped suddenly? Trending helps distinguish chronic problems from acute issues.

Chronic problems (success rate been 88% for six months) suggest systemic checkout issues or mismatched fraud rules. Acute problems (success rate dropped from 94% to 88% in two weeks) suggest recent changes—new fraud rule activated, payment provider having issues, checkout code change introduced bugs, or external factors like bank network changes.

What’s good: Above 92% is solid for most e-commerce. 85-92% is acceptable but improvable. Below 85% indicates significant fixable problems.

Step 2: Break down failures by decline reason

Stripe provides specific decline codes for every failed payment. Access decline reason reports showing distribution across failure types. Common decline reasons include:

Insufficient funds (do_not_honor): Customer’s bank declined because account lacks money. Nothing you can do. This typically represents 30-50% of all declines—high unavoidable baseline.

Card declined (generic_decline): Catch-all code when bank doesn’t specify reason. Often means fraud suspicion by bank, unusual purchase pattern, or temporary system issues. Some portion is unavoidable (genuine fraud), some is addressable (legitimate customers flagged incorrectly).

Incorrect card details (incorrect_number, invalid_expiry_date, incorrect_cvc): Customer typos during entry. Highly fixable through better form validation, clearer field labels, and real-time error messaging. If these codes represent 15%+ of your declines, checkout UX improvements will materially reduce failures.

Lost or stolen card (lost_card, stolen_card): Bank flagged card as compromised. Nothing you can do—this is working fraud prevention. Should be low percentage unless you’re attracting fraudsters, in which case you have bigger problems.

Expired card (expired_card): Customer using card past expiration. Partly addressable—if you have their updated card on file from previous purchase, automatic card updating services can fetch new details. Otherwise unavoidable.

Processing error (processing_error): Technical failure on Stripe or bank network side. Temporary and rare. If consistently high, suggests system integration issues worth investigating.

What to look for: If "incorrect card details" codes represent 20%+ of declines, prioritize checkout UX fixes. If "generic decline" dominates at 60%+, focus on fraud rule optimization or payment routing improvements. If "processing error" exceeds 3%, investigate technical implementation problems.

Step 3: Segment failures by payment method

Compare decline rates across payment types. If Visa succeeds 95% but Mastercard succeeds 88%, that gap suggests specific integration or routing issues with Mastercard transactions. If Apple Pay succeeds 96% but manual card entry succeeds 87%, the 9-point gap indicates form validation and user input errors with manual entry.

Large gaps between payment methods point to fixable problems. Similar success rates across methods suggest customer-side issues (unavoidable baseline) rather than implementation problems.

Step 4: Check failure patterns by geography and customer type

Review whether decline rates vary by customer location or behavior. International transactions often show 10-20 percentage point lower success than domestic due to fraud prevention systems being more conservative with foreign cards. New customers typically see lower success than returning customers because banks scrutinize first-time merchant transactions more closely.

If international success rate is 30+ points below domestic, your fraud rules or payment routing are too restrictive for global sales. If returning customers fail at same rate as new customers, you’re not benefiting from payment history and saved credentials as much as you should.

Fixes for the most common payment failure causes

Fix 1: Improve card number validation

Problem: Customers typo card numbers, hit submit, payment fails with "incorrect card number" error. They retype entire number, fail again, abandon.

How to fix: Implement real-time card number validation. As customer types, validate using Luhn algorithm (industry-standard card number check). Show immediate error if number is invalid before submission even reaches Stripe. Add card type detection (show Visa/Mastercard/Amex icon as they type) to reduce confusion.

Impact: Reduces "incorrect number" declines by 40-60%. For store with 10% decline rate where 20% are card number errors, this fix recovers 0.8-1.2% of all payment attempts.

Fix 2: Optimize fraud rule aggressiveness

Problem: Stripe Radar (fraud detection) blocks legitimate customers thinking they’re fraudulent. Conservative settings protect against fraud but create false positives—real customers declined incorrectly.

How to fix: Review Radar rules and risk thresholds. If fraud rate is very low (under 0.2%) but decline rate is high, Radar is probably too aggressive. Adjust rules to accept slightly more risk in exchange for fewer false positives. Start with small adjustments—increase risk score threshold from 65 to 70, observe impact for two weeks, iterate.

Enable 3D Secure selectively (high-value or high-risk transactions) rather than universally. Universal 3D Secure adds friction for all customers; selective use balances security and convenience.

Impact: Reducing false positives can recover 1-3% of payment attempts while marginally increasing fraud risk. Calculate tradeoff: if gaining $10k monthly revenue from accepting borderline transactions but incurring $500 additional fraud losses, net benefit is $9,500—worthwhile tradeoff.

Fix 3: Add payment retry logic

Problem: Temporary network issues, bank system timeouts, or authorization expires cause declines that would succeed if retried. Customers don’t know to retry—they just abandon.

How to fix: Implement smart retry logic for soft declines (temporary issues likely to succeed on retry). Don’t retry hard declines (insufficient funds, stolen card) that will never succeed. Retry automatically within minutes for processing errors. For timeout failures, wait hours before retry. Use Stripe’s smart retries feature for subscription payments.

Impact: Recovers 20-40% of soft decline failures. If 3% of payment attempts are soft declines, retry logic recovers 0.6-1.2% of all payments with zero customer action required.

Fix 4: Optimize mobile checkout experience

Problem: Mobile payment success rate runs 8-12 percentage points below desktop because small screens make typing difficult, autocorrect interferes with card numbers, and connection issues interrupt processing.

How to fix: Implement mobile-optimized payment forms with larger input fields, appropriate keyboard types (numeric for card numbers), and disabled autocorrect for sensitive fields. Add address autocomplete to reduce typing. Enable digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay) as one-tap payment options—they bypass manual entry entirely and succeed more reliably.

Impact: Improving mobile checkout UX typically lifts mobile success rate 3-6 percentage points. If 60% of your traffic is mobile with 85% success rate, improving to 88-91% recovers 1.8-3.6% of mobile payments, or 1-2% of total payment attempts.

Fix 5: Implement dynamic payment routing

Problem: Single payment processor means all transactions go through same route. Some cards and regions perform better through alternative routing—different acquiring banks have different approval rates depending on card type, issuing bank relationships, and geographic optimization.

How to fix: Use Stripe’s adaptive acceptance features or integrate multiple payment processors with intelligent routing. Route Visa through processor optimized for Visa, Mastercard through processor with better Mastercard relationships, international transactions through processors specialized in cross-border payments.

Impact: Payment routing optimization typically improves success rate 1-2 percentage points for stores with significant international volume or diverse payment method mix. Largest gains for businesses selling globally or processing high-value transactions where bank scrutiny is intense.

Measuring improvement: Before and after analysis

Before implementing fixes, document current state: overall success rate, decline rate by reason, payment method performance. This baseline proves whether fixes work.

After implementing changes, wait 2-4 weeks for statistically meaningful data. Compare new success rate to baseline. Calculate revenue impact: if success rate improved from 88% to 91% and you process $100k monthly, that 3-point improvement = $3k additional monthly revenue ($36k annually) from same traffic.

Test changes systematically. Implement one fix, measure impact, then implement next. Simultaneous changes make it impossible to know which worked. Sequential testing isolates cause and effect.

Frequently asked questions

What’s a realistic payment success rate target?

Target 92-95% for domestic-focused e-commerce. International stores typically see 88-92% due to higher fraud scrutiny on cross-border transactions. Below 88% indicates addressable problems worth fixing. Above 95% is excellent—diminishing returns from additional optimization at that level.

Should I reduce fraud protection to improve success rates?

Not reduce—optimize. Calculate the tradeoff: current fraud rate, current false positive rate (legitimate customers blocked), and costs of each. If fraud costs $500 monthly but false positives cost $3,000 in lost sales, you’re over-optimized for fraud prevention. Adjust rules to accept slightly more fraud risk in exchange for significantly fewer false positives. Goal is optimal balance, not zero fraud at any cost.

How long does it take to improve payment success rates?

Implementation: 1-4 weeks depending on fix complexity. Results: visible in 2-4 weeks after implementation. Simple fixes (form validation improvements) show impact within days. Complex fixes (payment routing optimization) require weeks of data to prove effectiveness. Start with quick wins (validation, mobile UX) for fast results, then tackle complex optimizations for incremental gains.

Will improved success rates increase fraud?

Possibly, slightly. Some legitimate customer recovery comes from accepting marginally riskier transactions. Monitor fraud rate closely after implementing changes. If fraud increases more than false positives decrease, roll back changes. Typically, smart optimization improves legitimate customer success far more than fraud increases—net result is profitable. Calculate actual dollars: $2k more revenue from legitimate customers, $200 more fraud losses = $1,800 net gain.

Peasy emails your key metrics every morning—get visibility in 2 minutes instead of 15 minutes checking dashboards. Starting at $49/month. Try free for 14 days.