Stripe analytics for e-commerce: What metrics actually matter

Stripe processes payments for millions of e-commerce stores, but most merchants check only three metrics: total revenue, number of transactions, and maybe refund count. These basics matter, but Stripe tracks dozens of additional metrics revealing checkout performance, payment failure patterns, customer payment preferences, and revenue optimization opportunities that basic numbers miss entirely.

Understanding which Stripe metrics actually influence business decisions helps small e-commerce stores optimize checkout conversion, reduce failed payments, and maximize revenue without drowning in data complexity. This guide identifies the essential Stripe analytics every e-commerce merchant should monitor, explains what each metric reveals about store health, and shows how to use payment data for better decisions.

What Stripe analytics provides for e-commerce

Stripe’s analytics system tracks the complete payment journey from checkout attempt through successful charge, providing visibility into payment success rates, customer payment behavior, revenue patterns, and technical performance. The platform organizes data across several categories: transaction metrics (volume and success rates), customer analytics (repeat behavior and lifetime value), payment method performance (which options customers prefer), and operational data (processing times and failure reasons).

For e-commerce stores, this data answers critical questions: Why are customers abandoning checkout? Which payment methods convert best? Are failed payments costing revenue? How do refund patterns affect profitability? Where in the payment flow do technical issues occur?

Stripe makes this data accessible through reporting dashboards, exportable data sets, and API access for custom analysis. Small stores typically use dashboard reporting for daily monitoring, while larger operations integrate Stripe data into business intelligence systems for deeper analysis.

Core Stripe metrics every e-commerce store should track

Successful payment rate

What it measures: Percentage of payment attempts that complete successfully, calculated as successful charges divided by total charge attempts.

Why it matters: This single metric captures overall payment system health. A store attempting 1,000 payments with 950 successes has 95% success rate. Five percentage points lost represents 50 potential customers who wanted to buy but couldn’t complete payment—that’s lost revenue from payment friction, not from marketing or product issues.

What’s good: E-commerce payment success rates typically range 85-95%. Above 93% is strong. Below 88% indicates significant payment friction requiring investigation. Stores selling high-ticket items often see lower rates (more payment scrutiny from banks), while stores selling sub-$50 products typically see higher rates.

How to improve: Identify failure patterns by reviewing declined payment reasons. Card declines account for most failures—these often relate to insufficient funds, expired cards, or incorrect card details. Offering multiple payment methods reduces dependency on single option. Implementing payment retry logic for soft declines (temporary issues like network problems) recovers additional transactions automatically.

Authorization versus capture rate

What it measures: Authorization rate shows percentage of payments approved by card networks. Capture rate shows percentage of authorized payments actually charged. The gap between these reveals operational inefficiencies.

Why it matters: Authorization confirms the customer can pay. Capture collects the money. Large gaps suggest operational problems: authorizing payments but failing to capture them (leaving money on table), capturing without proper authorization (risking chargebacks), or time delays between authorization and capture causing authorization expiration.

What’s good: Authorization and capture rates should match closely for immediate-fulfillment stores. If authorizing 95% but capturing only 87%, you’re losing 8% of approved revenue to operational issues. For stores with delayed fulfillment (pre-orders, custom products), some gap is normal as you authorize at purchase but capture at shipping.

How to improve: Review payment flow timing. Authorizations typically expire after 7 days—capturing beyond that requires new authorization. Automate capture for standard products. For custom/delayed products, implement systematic capture tracking ensuring authorizations don’t expire before capture.

Payment method breakdown

What it measures: Distribution of transactions across payment types: credit cards (and which card networks), debit cards, digital wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay), bank transfers, and alternative methods.

Why it matters: Different payment methods have different success rates, processing costs, and customer preferences. If 60% of customers use Visa but Visa has 88% success rate while Mastercard achieves 94%, you’re seeing more failures simply from payment mix. Digital wallets often convert better than manual card entry because stored credentials reduce typos and friction.

What to look for: Compare success rates across payment methods. Identify which methods customers prefer but struggle to complete. If many customers attempt Apple Pay but high failure rate suggests implementation issues, fixing that specific method improves overall conversion more than optimizing better-performing but less-popular methods.

How to use: Prioritize payment methods customers actually use. If offering six options but 95% of volume concentrates in three methods, focus optimization effort on those three. Test adding payment methods popular in your customer demographic but currently missing—if selling to European customers without SEPA direct debit option, adding it might unlock demand.

Dispute and chargeback rate

What it measures: Percentage of transactions disputed by customers, either through formal chargeback process or payment dispute mechanism.

Why it matters: Disputes cost money directly (you lose the transaction revenue plus dispute fees) and indirectly (high dispute rates trigger increased processing fees or account holds from payment networks). Dispute rate below 0.5% is normal e-commerce friction. Above 1% suggests product quality issues, shipping problems, or fraudulent transactions slipping through.

What’s good: Target under 0.5% dispute rate for legitimate e-commerce. Above 0.75% warrants investigation into root causes. Above 1.5% risks payment processor intervention—they may hold funds, increase fees, or restrict account access until dispute rate improves.

How to reduce: Review dispute reasons. "Product not received" disputes suggest shipping communication issues—send tracking numbers proactively and set realistic delivery expectations. "Product not as described" disputes indicate disconnect between marketing and product reality—improve product descriptions and photos. "Unrecognized charge" disputes often mean unclear merchant descriptor—ensure your business name on statements matches what customers expect.

Processing time and performance

What it measures: How long payment processing takes from customer submitting payment to charge confirming as successful or failed.

Why it matters: Slow payment processing creates checkout abandonment. If payment takes 8-10 seconds to process, customers doubt whether it worked, hit submit again (creating duplicate charges), or abandon assuming technical failure. Target under 3 seconds for standard card payments.

What to look for: Compare processing times across payment methods and time periods. Slowdowns during peak traffic suggest infrastructure bottlenecks. Slow processing for specific payment methods indicates integration issues. Processing under 2 seconds is excellent. Above 5 seconds creates noticeable friction affecting conversion.

How to improve: Optimize payment form implementation—reduce unnecessary fields, implement address autocomplete, validate card numbers client-side before submission. Use asynchronous processing where appropriate so customers see immediate confirmation rather than waiting for complete backend processing. Consider payment method performance when prioritizing which options to offer prominently.

Revenue by payment method

What it measures: Total revenue processed through each payment option, showing which methods generate most value regardless of transaction count.

Why it matters: Transaction count and revenue value often diverge. Credit cards might represent 70% of transactions but 85% of revenue (higher average order value), while digital wallets show opposite pattern (more transactions, lower values). Understanding this distribution guides optimization priorities—focus on methods driving most revenue, even if transaction count is lower.

What to look for: Compare average transaction value across payment methods. Premium payment options (certain credit cards, financing options like Klarna) often correlate with higher cart values. Budget-friendly options (debit cards, cash-on-delivery alternatives) skew toward lower values. This insight helps predict revenue impact of adding or removing payment methods.

Customer payment patterns

What it measures: How the same customers pay across multiple purchases—do they reuse saved payment methods, try different methods, or vary based on purchase type?

Why it matters: Repeat customers using saved payment methods convert faster and more reliably than new customers entering details manually. If customer saved card details but new purchases show manual entry, your payment retention system isn’t working properly. Conversely, customers switching payment methods between purchases might indicate dissatisfaction with checkout experience or payment option performance.

What to look for: Percentage of returning customers using saved versus new payment methods. High reuse rate (60%+) indicates smooth customer experience and good payment method management. Low reuse despite saving payment details suggests implementation issues or customer trust concerns.

Using Stripe analytics for optimization

Identify high-friction payment methods

Review success rates across all offered payment methods. If one method shows 15-20 percentage points lower success than others, investigate why. Sometimes integration issues cause problems (incorrect API implementation, outdated SDKs). Other times, certain payment methods simply don’t work well for your customer demographic or product type.

Decision framework: If payment method has low success rate but high customer demand (many attempt it despite failures), fix the integration—customers want it. If low success rate and low adoption (few attempts, most fail), consider removing it—optimizing rarely-used, poorly-performing methods diverts effort from more impactful improvements.

Reduce failed payment revenue loss

Calculate monthly failed payment volume: total payment attempts minus successful payments, multiplied by average order value. This number represents theoretical revenue loss from payment friction. If attempting 1,000 payments monthly with 90% success rate and $100 average order value, 100 failed payments = $10,000 potential monthly revenue loss.

Prioritize improvements based on impact: reducing failure rate from 10% to 8% (2 percentage point improvement) recovers $2,000 monthly in this example. Compare that gain against implementation cost of fixes—improving payment form validation, adding retry logic, optimizing mobile checkout experience, or expanding payment method options.

Optimize payment method mix

Balance three factors: customer demand (which methods do customers attempt?), success rate (which methods complete reliably?), and processing cost (what does each method cost you?). Ideal payment method ranks high on all three dimensions—customers want it, it works reliably, and cost is reasonable.

Problematic combinations: high customer demand + low success rate = fix implementation urgently. Low customer demand + high success rate + high cost = consider removing to reduce unnecessary complexity and processing fees. High demand + high success + high cost = keep despite cost because customer conversion justifies expense.

Improve checkout conversion with data

Stripe analytics reveal where checkout breaks down. High authorization failures suggest fraud detection is too aggressive (rejecting legitimate customers) or customers entering incorrect details (form design issues). Long processing times correlate with abandonment—slow confirmation makes customers doubt completion. Payment method mismatch (customers attempting methods you don’t support well) suggests expanding options.

Test changes systematically. If adding Apple Pay, compare conversion before and after launch. If optimizing form validation, measure failed payment rate reduction. Data-driven iteration compounds—each 1-2% improvement in payment success translates directly to revenue increase without additional traffic or marketing spend.

Common Stripe analytics mistakes

Mistake 1: Focusing only on revenue totals

Checking total revenue daily but ignoring success rates, payment failures, and method performance. Revenue can grow while payment system deteriorates—more traffic masks declining conversion. Monitor success rate alongside revenue to catch degradation early.

Mistake 2: Treating all payment failures equally

Some failures are unavoidable (customer genuinely has insufficient funds). Others are fixable (network timeouts, expired authorizations, form validation errors). Review failure reasons to distinguish fixable from acceptable. Optimize what you control; don’t obsess over what you can’t.

Mistake 3: Offering too many payment methods

Adding every possible payment option hoping to maximize conversion. But each method adds complexity, maintenance burden, and potential failure points. If offering eight methods but 95% of volume concentrates in three, the other five create complexity without proportional benefit. Prune underperforming methods that few customers use successfully.

Mistake 4: Ignoring mobile payment performance

Analyzing overall metrics without segmenting by device. Mobile payment success rates often run 5-10 percentage points below desktop due to smaller screens (typing errors), connectivity issues, and different payment method availability. Optimize mobile checkout separately—improvements here often have outsized impact since mobile traffic typically exceeds desktop for e-commerce.

Mistake 5: Not acting on dispute patterns

Reviewing dispute rate but not investigating why disputes occur. Disputes cluster around root causes: shipping delays, unclear product descriptions, confusing merchant descriptor on statements, or actual fraud. Identify patterns in dispute reasons and fix underlying causes rather than treating disputes as random bad luck.

Frequently asked questions

How often should I check Stripe analytics?

Daily quick check (2-3 minutes): Review successful payment rate and total revenue to catch obvious problems immediately. Weekly deeper review (10-15 minutes): Compare payment method performance, check for failure rate changes, review dispute trends. Monthly analysis (30-60 minutes): Calculate failed payment revenue loss, evaluate payment method mix, identify optimization opportunities.

What’s a normal payment failure rate for e-commerce?

Expect 5-15% of payment attempts to fail for reasons beyond your control (insufficient funds, expired cards, incorrect details). Target success rate above 90%. Stores consistently above 95% have excellent payment infrastructure. Below 85% indicates significant fixable issues. Remember that product type, average order value, and customer demographic affect baseline rates—compare your performance to your own historical data rather than generic benchmarks.

Should we remove payment methods with low success rates?

Consider demand alongside performance. Low success rate but high customer demand means fix the implementation—customers want that option. Low success rate and low demand means removal makes sense—simplify checkout by pruning methods few customers use successfully. Calculate impact: if method represents 2% of attempts with 70% success rate, removing it affects only 1.4% of total successful payments but reduces complexity for all customers.

How do we reduce chargebacks and disputes?

Address root causes revealed in dispute reasons. Shipping disputes: improve delivery communication, send proactive tracking updates, set realistic delivery expectations. Product disputes: ensure descriptions accurately represent products, improve photos, clarify sizing or specifications. Fraud disputes: implement better fraud detection, verify addresses for high-risk orders, use 3D Secure for suspicious transactions. Unrecognized charge disputes: optimize merchant descriptor on credit card statements so customers recognize your business name.

Can Stripe analytics show why specific payments failed?

Yes. Stripe provides decline codes and error messages for failed payments, grouped into categories: card declined (insufficient funds, exceeds limit), expired card, incorrect details (wrong CVV, invalid card number), network issues, and fraud prevention blocks. Access these through reporting interface to understand failure patterns. Focus on high-frequency failure reasons that you can influence through better checkout design or fraud rule adjustment.

Peasy automatically emails your key metrics every morning to your entire team—no dashboard checking required. Starting at $49/month. Try free for 14 days.