Google Ads analytics for e-commerce: What metrics actually matter

Google Ads provides dozens of metrics across campaigns, ad groups, keywords, and audiences. Most store owners check everything—impressions, clicks, CTR, Quality Score, average position, conversion rate, cost per conversion—hoping something reveals why ROAS isn’t where it should be. Fifteen minutes daily reviewing numbers without clear action plan. The problem isn’t insufficient data. It’s unclear which metrics actually drive profitable decisions versus which just describe what happened.

Here’s what changes when you focus on the right metrics: Instead of celebrating 4% CTR while losing money on every sale, you track profit per conversion and realize you’re paying $45 to acquire customers worth $38. Instead of optimizing for lower cost-per-click, you focus on conversion value and discover higher CPC keywords deliver customers who spend 60% more. Instead of generic campaign performance reviews, you identify which specific ad groups and product categories generate actual profit versus which waste budget.

This guide explains which Google Ads metrics correlate with profitable growth, which are vanity metrics that mislead optimization efforts, and how to organize analytics focus around numbers that inform spend decisions rather than just report activity.

Why most Google Ads metrics don’t matter for small stores

Google Ads dashboard shows comprehensive metrics because different advertisers have different goals. Enterprise brands optimize for awareness (impressions matter). Lead generation businesses optimize for volume (click volume matters). E-commerce stores need profit—revenue minus ad spend must be positive and growing.

The issue: Most metrics describe activity, not profitability. Impressions show how many people saw ads but not whether those people buy. Clicks show interest but not purchase intent. Even conversions can mislead—if converting visitors costs more than they spend, high conversion volume accelerates losses rather than profit.

Useful metrics for e-commerce share three characteristics: they include both revenue and cost components, they reveal specific optimization opportunities, and changes suggest clear actions. Metrics without all three waste analysis time.

The five Google Ads metrics that actually matter for e-commerce

1. Return on ad spend (ROAS)

What it measures: Total conversion value divided by total ad spend. ROAS of 4.0 means you generate $4 revenue for every $1 spent on ads. Calculated as (Revenue from Ads / Ad Spend) × 100%.

Why it matters: Only metric that directly answers "Are these ads profitable?" Everything else—clicks, impressions, CTR—might correlate with profitability but ROAS measures it directly. ROAS of 3.5 with $100 daily spend means $350 daily revenue and $250 daily contribution before product costs. ROAS of 1.8 means $180 revenue from $100 spend—potentially unprofitable after product costs and overhead.

What’s good: Target ROAS depends on margins. Stores with 60% margins can profit at ROAS 2.0. Stores with 30% margins need ROAS 4.0+ for same profit. General benchmark: ROAS above 4.0 indicates strong performance for most e-commerce stores. Between 2.5-4.0 is workable depending on margins. Below 2.5 typically unprofitable unless margins are exceptional.

How to improve: Increase ROAS by raising conversion value (upsells, bundles, higher-ticket products) or decreasing ad spend per conversion (better targeting, improved ad relevance, optimized landing pages). Review at campaign level to identify which campaigns deliver strong ROAS versus which waste budget.

2. Conversion value per click

What it measures: Average revenue generated per ad click. Calculated as Total Conversion Value / Total Clicks. Different from cost-per-click—this shows value created, not cost incurred.

Why it matters: Reveals whether traffic quality is improving or degrading. Conversion value per click of $8 means each visitor who clicks generates $8 in revenue on average. If this metric trends up while maintaining click volume, campaigns are attracting more qualified, higher-value customers. If trending down, traffic quality is declining—more clicks but less revenue per visitor.

What to look for: Segment by campaign, ad group, and keyword. High-performing keywords might generate $12 per click while poor performers generate $2 per click. This variance reveals optimization opportunities—increase budget for high-value keywords, reduce or pause low-value keywords regardless of CPC or CTR.

How to use it: Compare conversion value per click to cost per click for each keyword or ad group. Keywords where value significantly exceeds cost (3-5x or more) are winners—increase bids and budget. Keywords where value barely exceeds or falls below cost should be paused or improved through better ad copy and landing page alignment.

3. Cost per conversion

What it measures: Average amount spent to generate one conversion (sale). Calculated as Total Ad Spend / Total Conversions. Shows customer acquisition cost through this channel.

Why it matters: Must be compared to customer value to determine profitability. Cost per conversion of $25 is excellent if average order value is $100 with 50% margins ($50 profit, $25 acquisition cost = $25 net). Same $25 cost is problematic if average order value is $45 with 40% margins ($18 profit, $25 acquisition cost = $7 loss per sale).

What’s good: Target depends on your economics. General rule: cost per conversion should be 25-40% of average order value for immediate profitability on first purchase. Higher percentages can work if customer lifetime value significantly exceeds first purchase value (repeat purchase business models).

How to improve: Lower cost per conversion through better ad targeting (reduce wasted clicks), improved Quality Scores (lowers CPCs), optimized landing pages (increases conversion rate), or refined keyword selection (focus on high-intent searches). Track changes over time—rising cost per conversion indicates campaigns becoming less efficient.

4. Conversion rate by campaign and product category

What it measures: Percentage of ad clicks that result in purchases, segmented by campaign type and product category advertised.

Why it matters: Reveals which products and campaign structures convert paid traffic most effectively. Branded campaigns might convert at 8-12% while cold prospecting converts at 1-3%. Product category A converts at 5% while category B converts at 1.5%. These differences inform budget allocation—invest more in high-converting campaigns and products, reduce spend on poor converters.

What to look for: Large variance between similar campaigns suggests optimization opportunities. If one product category converts 4x better than others, either expand that category or improve how you’re presenting underperforming categories. If desktop converts 6% but mobile converts 2%, mobile experience needs optimization or bid adjustments.

How to use it: Set minimum acceptable conversion rate thresholds. Campaigns or ad groups below threshold get 2-week optimization window (new ad copy, landing page tests, bid adjustments). If no improvement, pause and reallocate budget to better performers. Continuously shift spend toward highest-converting segments.

5. Impression share and lost impression share analysis

What it measures: Percentage of available impressions your ads received versus total available impressions for your keywords. Lost impression share shows why you didn’t capture remaining impressions—budget constraints or low ad rank.

Why it matters: For profitable campaigns (strong ROAS, good conversion rates), low impression share indicates untapped opportunity. Campaign with 4.5 ROAS but only 35% impression share due to budget limitations means increasing budget could profitably scale revenue. Campaign with 1.8 ROAS and 75% impression share indicates you’re already capturing most available traffic—scaling requires improving ROAS, not increasing impressions.

What to look for: High-ROAS campaigns losing impression share to budget should receive budget increases. High-ROAS campaigns losing impression share to rank need bid increases or Quality Score improvements. Low-ROAS campaigns with high impression share are saturated—need fundamental optimization or should be paused.

How to use it: Monthly review of top-performing campaigns (top 20% by ROAS). Check impression share. If losing significant share due to budget and ROAS justifies expansion, test 20-30% budget increases. Monitor whether ROAS maintains at higher spend levels. If yes, continue scaling. If ROAS drops significantly, roll back to previous budget.

Important secondary metrics worth checking weekly

Five core metrics above deserve daily or every-other-day attention. These secondary metrics matter but don’t require constant monitoring:

Quality Score by keyword: Affects cost-per-click and ad position. Low Quality Scores (below 5) indicate poor ad relevance or landing page experience. Review monthly to identify improvement opportunities. Not daily priority unless running very small campaigns.

Click-through rate by ad variant: Helps optimize ad copy through A/B testing. Higher CTR indicates more compelling messaging. Review when testing new ads (weekly during active tests, monthly otherwise). Don’t optimize CTR at expense of conversion rate—clicks matter only if they convert.

Search term report analysis: Shows actual search queries triggering your ads. Weekly review identifies irrelevant searches to exclude (negative keywords) and high-performing searches to add as exact match keywords. Critical for preventing wasted spend but not daily priority.

Device performance breakdown: Revenue and ROAS segmented by device (mobile, desktop, tablet). Monthly review informs bid adjustments by device. If mobile ROAS is 60% of desktop, reduce mobile bids or improve mobile experience.

Geographic performance: Conversion rates and ROAS by location. Monthly review reveals whether certain regions outperform others. Can inform bid adjustments or geographic targeting exclusions.

Vanity metrics to ignore in Google Ads

These metrics feel important but don’t reliably inform profitable decisions:

Impressions in isolation: High impression volume without conversion context is meaningless. One million impressions generating zero revenue is worse than 10,000 impressions generating $5,000 revenue. Impressions matter only for calculating impression share and CTR, not as standalone success metric.

Clicks without conversion context: Celebrating 500 daily clicks means nothing if they don’t convert. High click volume with low conversion rate often indicates misleading ad copy attracting wrong audience or poor landing page experience. Focus on conversion value per click, not click volume.

CTR as primary optimization target: High CTR with terrible conversion rate means ads attract clicks but not buyers—potentially making problems worse by increasing wasted spend. CTR matters for Quality Score but optimizing CTR at expense of conversion quality destroys profitability.

Average position (for campaigns still showing it): Position 1 isn’t always profitable. Position 3 converting at 5% with $2 CPC beats position 1 converting at 4% with $4 CPC. Optimize for profitable outcomes, not ad position.

Quality Score as goal itself: Quality Score affects costs and eligibility but perfect 10 Quality Score with poor ROAS is worthless. Use Quality Score diagnostically (identify improvement areas) but optimize for ROAS and conversion value, not score.

How to organize your Google Ads analytics routine

Daily check (3-5 minutes):

1. Overall ROAS yesterday versus 7-day average—significant change?

2. Total spend versus daily budget—pacing correctly or hitting limits early?

3. Conversion count and cost per conversion—within expected ranges?

4. Any campaigns with dramatic performance changes (50%+ ROAS swings)—what happened?

Takes 3-5 minutes. Catches major issues. Identifies obvious problems requiring immediate attention.

Weekly review (20-30 minutes):

1. ROAS by campaign—which overperform and underperform versus targets?

2. Conversion value per click by ad group—which drive highest-value traffic?

3. Search term report—new irrelevant queries to exclude, high-performers to add?

4. Ad performance—test results from any active A/B tests?

5. Budget allocation—should budget shift from underperformers to top performers?

6. Document one optimization to implement based on data

Weekly review reveals patterns daily checks miss and informs tactical optimizations.

Monthly strategic review (1-2 hours):

1. Month-over-month performance—ROAS, conversion volume, revenue trends

2. Impression share analysis—scaling opportunities for top campaigns?

3. Device and geographic performance—bid adjustment opportunities?

4. Landing page conversion rates—which pages need optimization?

5. Customer value analysis—are acquired customers spending more or less over time?

6. Competitive landscape changes—auction insights showing new competitors?

Using Google Ads metrics to drive decisions

Scenario 1: Campaign with 5.5 ROAS but low impression share (40%) due to budget

What it means: Profitable campaign constrained by budget. Significant untapped opportunity.

Actions: Increase campaign budget 25-40%. Monitor whether ROAS maintains above target (4.0+) at higher spend. If yes, continue scaling. Calculate incremental profit from expansion: If raising budget $50 daily at 5.0 ROAS generates $250 additional revenue, that’s $200 additional gross revenue daily ($6,000 monthly) before product costs. Even at 40% margins, that’s $2,400 monthly additional profit.

Scenario 2: Cost per conversion rising from $28 to $42 over 6 weeks despite stable conversion rate

What it means: CPC increasing (more competition, lower Quality Scores) or click quality declining (same conversion rate but paying more per click).

Actions: Review auction insights for increased competition. Check Quality Scores for drops. Analyze search terms for new irrelevant queries. Test new ad copy to improve CTR and Quality Score. Consider whether continuing at higher costs still profitable or if budget should shift to better-performing channels.

Scenario 3: High conversion rate (6%) but low ROAS (2.2) for specific campaign

What it means: Converting well but attracting low-value customers. Campaign drives volume but not valuable volume.

Actions: Analyze average order value from this campaign versus others. If significantly lower, campaign may attract bargain hunters or promote wrong products. Test featuring higher-ticket products. Adjust targeting to reach customers with higher purchase intent. Calculate whether low ROAS is acceptable if customers have strong lifetime value through repeats. If not, reduce budget or pause.

Frequently asked questions

What’s a realistic ROAS target for small e-commerce stores?

Depends on margins and business model. Stores with 50%+ margins can profit at ROAS 2.5-3.0. Lower-margin stores (30-40%) need ROAS 4.0-5.0+ for similar profit. Account for product costs, shipping, overhead—not just ad spend versus revenue. Aim for ROAS where profit per conversion exceeds acquisition cost by comfortable margin.

Should I track ROAS in Google Ads or in my e-commerce platform?

Both, but they’ll differ due to attribution. Google Ads uses last-click attribution (credits ad that got final click). Your platform may use different attribution window or model. Use Google Ads ROAS for campaign optimization decisions (which campaigns to scale). Use platform data for overall business profitability analysis. Accept they won’t match exactly.

How long should I wait before pausing underperforming campaigns?

Depends on conversion volume. Campaigns with under 20 conversions haven’t generated enough data for reliable ROAS assessment—give more time. Campaigns with 50+ conversions showing consistent poor ROAS (below break-even) should be paused or significantly restructured. Test optimizations for 2-3 weeks before final decision. Small stores can’t afford long experiments with unprofitable spend.

How can I improve metrics without spending more time in dashboards?

Focus optimization on highest-leverage opportunities identified by metrics. If 20% of campaigns drive 80% of profitable revenue, optimize those intensively and pause bottom performers. Automated rules can pause poor performers and adjust bids based on performance. Weekly reviews sufficient for most small stores—daily changes often react to normal variance rather than real trends.

Peasy automatically emails your key metrics every morning to your entire team—no dashboard checking required. Starting at $49/month. Try free for 14 days.