Ads analytics vs website analytics: Getting the full picture

You check Google Ads showing 4.2 ROAS. Then check Google Analytics showing same campaign with 2.8 ROAS. Which is right? Both, sort of. They’re measuring different things with different attribution models. Google Ads credits itself generously (last Google Ad click gets credit). Google Analytics uses different attribution rules and captures broader context. Neither tells complete story alone. Together they reveal where paid traffic comes from and what happens after it arrives.

Here’s the thing about ads analytics versus website analytics: they serve different purposes. Ads platforms (Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager) optimize campaign performance—which keywords, audiences, and creatives drive clicks and conversions. Website analytics (Google Analytics, platform analytics) reveal full customer journey—how visitors navigate site, where they drop off, what paths lead to purchases. You need both, but for different decisions.

This guide explains what each analytics type shows, where they differ and why, and how to use both together for comprehensive understanding of paid traffic performance without drowning in conflicting numbers.

Key differences between ads analytics and website analytics

Attribution models

Ads platforms (Google Ads, Meta): Use last-click attribution heavily favoring themselves. If customer clicks Google Ad, then clicks Facebook Ad, then purchases, Google Ads credits the earlier click within its attribution window while Facebook credits its click. Both report the conversion.

Website analytics (Google Analytics 4): Uses data-driven or customizable attribution distributing credit across multiple touchpoints. Might attribute 40% to initial organic search, 30% to email click, 30% to final paid ad. Shows fuller journey but creates mismatches with ads platform reporting.

Why it matters: Explains why conversion counts and ROAS differ between systems. Neither is “wrong”—they answer different questions. Ads platforms answer “what drove this specific conversion?” Website analytics answer “what path did customer take?”

Conversion tracking scope

Ads platforms: Track only conversions where their ads were involved. If customer never clicked ad but purchased, ads platform doesn’t see it. If customer clicked ad 35 days ago and purchased today, typically not counted (attribution windows usually 7-30 days).

Website analytics: Track all conversions regardless of source. Shows purchases from organic, direct, email, social, paid, referral. Provides complete revenue picture including channels ads platforms don’t see or claim.

Why it matters: Website analytics show total business performance. Ads analytics show specific campaign contribution. Comparing total revenue between them is apples-to-oranges—ads platforms should show subset of website analytics total unless attribution overlap inflates ads platform numbers.

Data granularity and optimization focus

Ads platforms: Deep granularity for campaign elements—performance by keyword, ad creative, audience segment, device, time of day, placement. Designed for campaign optimization decisions—which keywords to bid on, which creative performs best, which audiences convert.

Website analytics: Deep granularity for on-site behavior—landing page performance, navigation paths, checkout funnel drop-offs, time on site, pages per session. Designed for site optimization decisions—which pages need improvement, where visitors abandon, what content engages.

Why it matters: Use ads platforms to optimize campaigns (targeting, bidding, creative). Use website analytics to optimize site experience (landing pages, checkout flow, product pages). Different tools for different optimization areas.

What ads analytics shows (and doesn’t)

What you get from Google Ads or Meta Ads Manager:

• Campaign performance metrics: Impressions, clicks, CTR, conversions, cost per conversion, ROAS by campaign, ad group, keyword, or audience

• Auction and cost data: How much you’re paying per click or impression, how you rank in auctions, competitive overlap

• Ad creative performance: Which headlines, descriptions, images, or videos drive best results

• Search query insights: (Google Ads) Actual searches triggering your ads, match type performance

• Audience data: (Meta) Demographics, interests, and behaviors of people seeing and clicking ads

What you don’t get:

• What happens after click: bounce rate, time on site, pages viewed, path to purchase

• Cross-channel journey: did visitors come from email first, then organic, then clicked ad?

• On-site engagement quality: which content resonated, what questions visitors had

• Technical issues: slow load times, broken checkout, mobile usability problems

• Non-ad traffic performance: how paid compares to organic, direct, or referral

Best used for: Optimizing which ads to run, how much to bid, which audiences to target, and how to allocate budget across campaigns.

What website analytics shows (and doesn’t)

What you get from Google Analytics 4 or platform analytics:

• Full traffic picture: All sources (organic, direct, paid, email, social, referral) with revenue and conversion data for each

• On-site behavior: Landing page performance, bounce rates, exit pages, navigation paths, time on page

• Conversion funnels: Where visitors drop off in checkout, how many steps to purchase, abandonment points

• Content engagement: Which product pages drive sales, which blog posts attract visitors, which pages lead to exits

• Customer journey: Multi-touch attribution showing all touchpoints before purchase

• Technical performance: Page load times, browser and device breakdowns, site search behavior

What you don’t get:

• Detailed ad auction data: CPCs, Quality Scores, competitor insights

• Ad creative performance: which specific headlines, images, or videos work best

• Keyword-level data: performance by specific search terms or match types

• Audience targeting insights: detailed demographic and interest data for paid audiences

Best used for: Understanding full customer journey, optimizing site experience, identifying friction points in conversion funnel, comparing performance across all traffic sources.

Why numbers don’t match (and what to do about it)

Problem 1: Conversion count discrepancies

Google Ads reports 145 conversions. Google Analytics reports 118 conversions from Google Ads traffic. Why?

Reasons:

• Attribution window differences (Ads uses 30-day click, Analytics might use 7-day)

• Cross-device tracking variations (user clicks ad on mobile, purchases on desktop)

• Privacy and consent differences (users blocking Analytics but not Ads tracking)

• Conversion counting methodology (Ads counts all, Analytics deduplicates across sources)

What to do: Accept 10-20% variance as normal. Use Ads platform numbers for campaign optimization decisions (which campaigns to scale). Use Analytics numbers for business reporting (total revenue and profitability). Don’t waste time trying to reconcile perfectly—they won’t match due to fundamental methodology differences.

Problem 2: ROAS differences

Facebook reports 4.8 ROAS. Google Analytics shows Facebook traffic generated 3.2 ROAS. Significant gap.

Reasons:

• Facebook uses view-through attribution (people who saw ad but didn’t click)

• Analytics uses stricter click-based attribution

• Attribution window differences affect which conversions get credited

• Facebook optimistically credits itself; Analytics distributes credit across sources

What to do: Use Facebook’s numbers for campaign optimization (which audiences and creative work). Use Analytics numbers for budget allocation across channels (how much to invest in Facebook versus Google versus email). Truth is somewhere between—both numbers inform different decisions.

Problem 3: Revenue totals don’t add up

Sum of revenue from Google Ads + Meta Ads + Email exceeds total revenue in Analytics by 30%.

Reason: Attribution overlap. Same conversion credited to multiple sources. Customer might click Google Ad, then Facebook Ad, then email link before purchasing. Each platform credits itself with the full conversion value, creating double or triple counting when summed.

What to do: Never sum revenue across ad platforms. Use website analytics total revenue as source of truth for business performance. Use individual platform revenue claims for relative optimization (which platform delivers best ROAS on its own terms).

How to use both together effectively

For campaign optimization: Use ads platform data. Google Ads and Meta Ads Manager provide granularity needed for tactical campaign decisions—keyword bids, audience targeting, creative testing, budget allocation within platform.

For site optimization: Use website analytics. Google Analytics or platform analytics reveal landing page effectiveness, checkout friction, content gaps, and technical issues affecting all traffic including paid.

For budget allocation: Use website analytics for cross-channel comparison. Compare true incremental revenue and profitability across Google Ads, Meta, email, and organic to inform budget distribution across channels.

For profitability assessment: Combine both. Use ads platform spend data (most accurate) with website analytics revenue data (more conservative attribution) for realistic ROI calculation. This produces conservative but reliable profitability picture.

For attribution understanding: Check both regularly. If ads platform reports 5.0 ROAS but Analytics shows 2.8 ROAS, understand you’re somewhere in middle. Ads platform shows maximum possible credit; Analytics shows multi-touch reality. Use platforms' numbers to optimize campaigns, Analytics numbers to assess true channel contribution.

Practical workflow: Daily and weekly checks

Daily (5 minutes total):

• Ads platforms (3 min): ROAS, cost per conversion, budget pacing—any campaigns dramatically over or underperforming?

• Website analytics (2 min): Total revenue, conversion rate, any technical issues or traffic anomalies?

Weekly (30 minutes total):

• Ads platforms (20 min): Campaign performance analysis, creative testing results, audience optimization, budget reallocation opportunities

• Website analytics (10 min): Landing page conversion rates for paid traffic, checkout funnel drop-offs, site search patterns, cross-channel performance comparison

Monthly (2 hours total):

• Comprehensive cross-channel analysis in website analytics

• Deep campaign audits in ads platforms

• Reconcile discrepancies to understand attribution impact

• Calculate true profitability using combined data

Frequently asked questions

Which system should I trust when numbers conflict?

Trust ads platforms for campaign optimization (which ads work). Trust website analytics for business decisions (total revenue, profitability). Neither is “right” universally—they serve different purposes. Use each for what it’s designed for.

Do I need both, or can I use just website analytics?

You need both. Website analytics lacks granularity for campaign optimization—can’t tell you which specific keywords or ad creative drive results. Ads platforms lack full-journey perspective—can’t show on-site behavior or cross-channel attribution. Both together provide complete picture.

How do I explain discrepancies to stakeholders or team members?

Explain that different systems measure different things. Ads platforms answer “how are our ads performing?” Website analytics answer “how is our business performing?” Discrepancies are normal and expected. Focus discussions on trends and optimizations, not reconciling exact numbers between incompatible systems.

Which attribution model is most accurate?

None perfectly capture reality. Last-click (ads platforms) overstates final touchpoint. Multi-touch (Analytics) distributes credit but still relies on tracking limitations. Use multiple models to triangulate reality. Most important is consistency—pick one model for business decisions and stick with it for comparable trend analysis.

Peasy automatically sends analytics to your entire team each morning—eliminate coordination overhead. Starting at $49/month. Try free for 14 days.