How to measure collection performance

A collection either works or it doesn’t. But “works” means different things depending on what you measure. Revenue alone misses the picture. A collection generating $200k in sales might look successful until you realize half sold at 50% off, returns ran 40%, and you’re still sitting on dead inventory six months later.

Measuring collection performance properly means tracking the right metrics at the right times. First-week velocity tells you something different than 90-day sell-through. Full-price revenue matters more than total revenue. And comparing collections against each other reveals patterns that single-collection analysis misses.

This guide covers how to measure fashion collections from launch through clearance—what to track, when to track it, and how to interpret the numbers.

The collection performance framework

Collection measurement happens in three phases. Launch phase (weeks 1-4) reveals initial customer response. Mid-season phase (weeks 5-12) shows sustained demand and identifies winners and losers. End-of-season phase (weeks 13+) determines final profitability after markdowns and clearance.

Each phase requires different metrics and different benchmarks. Strong launch performance doesn’t guarantee strong final results. Slow starts sometimes recover. Understanding which phase you’re in shapes how you interpret the data.

Before diving into specific metrics, establish your baseline. What did previous collections achieve? Without historical comparison, you can’t distinguish good from great or acceptable from disappointing.

Launch phase metrics (weeks 1-4)

First-week sell-through

The first week predicts more than any other period. Strong collections show 8-15% sell-through in week one. Exceptional launches hit 20%+. Weak collections struggle below 5%.

Calculate first-week sell-through by dividing units sold by units received. Do this at the collection level for overall health, then drill into individual styles. A collection might average 10% sell-through while hiding a star performer at 25% and a dud at 2%.

First-week data enables fast decisions. Styles exceeding expectations might warrant reorder consideration. Styles significantly underperforming need attention—better photography, repositioned pricing, or marketing focus. Week one is too early for markdowns but not too early for merchandising adjustments.

Traffic-to-collection ratio

Are customers finding the new collection? Compare traffic to collection pages versus overall site traffic. If you’re promoting the new collection heavily but only 15% of visitors view those pages, something’s wrong with navigation, homepage merchandising, or campaign targeting.

Benchmark against previous launches. If spring 2023 collection pages captured 25% of traffic in week one but spring 2024 captures only 18%, investigate. Did you change site layout? Reduce homepage placement? Target different audiences?

Low collection traffic with strong conversion suggests marketing problem. High traffic with weak conversion suggests product or pricing problem. The ratio helps diagnose issues.

Full-price conversion rate

Early conversion rate indicates price acceptance. Customers willing to pay full price in week one signal strong product-market fit. If conversion only happens when you add launch promotions, you’ve learned something about perceived value.

Track conversion rate for collection items specifically, not site-wide. Overall conversion might stay steady while new collection underperforms. Or new collection might drive conversion lift that masks weakness elsewhere.

Compare to previous collection launches. If fall collections typically convert at 2.8% in week one and this fall converts at 2.1%, you have early warning of problems. If you’re at 3.5%, you might have a winner worth investing in.

Mid-season metrics (weeks 5-12)

Cumulative sell-through rate

By week 8, healthy collections reach 40-60% sell-through. Below 35% signals trouble—you’ll likely need aggressive markdowns to clear inventory. Above 65% might mean you underordered and left money on the table.

Track sell-through weekly during mid-season. The curve shape matters as much as the absolute number. Steady consistent selling differs from early spike followed by plateau. A collection at 45% sell-through with flat recent weeks needs different action than one at 45% with accelerating velocity.

Segment by category and price point. Tops might sell through faster than bottoms. Entry-price items might move while premium pieces stall. These patterns inform both current-season tactics and future buying decisions.

Gross margin realization

Revenue matters less than margin. A collection selling well at full price delivers more profit than one requiring constant promotion. Track what percentage of revenue comes from full-price sales versus marked-down sales.

Calculate realized margin: (Actual revenue / Potential full-price revenue) × 100. If a collection could generate $100k at full price but actually generates $75k after discounts, your margin realization is 75%. Strong collections maintain 80%+ through mid-season. Struggling collections drop below 70%.

Watch margin realization trends week over week. If you started at 95% in week one and you’re at 72% in week eight, discounting is eroding value. This might be necessary for slow movers, but should concern you if it’s happening across the collection.

Style-level performance distribution

Collections contain winners, average performers, and losers. Understanding this distribution helps with decision-making. A healthy collection might show 20% of styles exceeding expectations, 60% meeting expectations, and 20% underperforming.

If your distribution skews negative—40% underperforming—the collection has problems beyond individual styles. Maybe the overall aesthetic missed the market. Maybe pricing is off across the board. Maybe timing was wrong.

Identify your top performers by mid-season. These styles might warrant reorders, extended marketing, or similar styles in future collections. Also identify bottom performers for markdown prioritization or removal from key merchandising positions.

Return rate by style

Returns affect true collection performance. A style selling well but returning at 45% isn’t actually performing. It’s churning inventory and destroying margin through shipping and processing costs.

By mid-season, you have enough return data to identify problems. Styles with return rates 15+ points above category average need investigation. Is it sizing? Quality? Photography that misrepresents the product? The reason determines the fix.

Factor returns into your sell-through and margin calculations. Net sell-through (accounting for returns) gives truer performance picture than gross sell-through. A style at 50% gross sell-through with 40% returns really sits at 30% net.

End-of-season metrics (weeks 13+)

Final sell-through

End-of-season target: 85-95% sell-through including markdowns. Below 80% means you’re carrying dead inventory into the next season or writing it off entirely. Above 95% suggests you could have priced higher or ordered more.

Compare final sell-through across collections. If fall consistently sells through at 88% but spring struggles to hit 80%, you might have seasonal buying imbalance. Or spring product selection needs improvement. Or spring marketing underperforms.

Track how long reaching final sell-through takes. If you hit 90% in week 16, you managed the season well. If you’re still pushing inventory in week 24, something went wrong—either initial buying or markdown timing.

Markdown depth analysis

How deep did you have to discount? This metric directly affects profitability. A collection requiring only 20-30% discounts to clear maintains healthy margins. One requiring 50-70% discounts struggles toward profitability.

Calculate average discount across all marked-down items, weighted by units sold at each discount level. Selling 100 units at 20% off and 500 units at 50% off produces different results than the reverse.

Analyze which styles needed deepest discounts. Were they concentrated in specific categories? Price points? Were they items you knew were risky or surprises? These patterns inform future buying decisions.

Carryover inventory value

What didn’t sell becomes carryover. This inventory ties up cash, occupies warehouse space, and eventually sells at deep discount or gets written off. Calculate the retail value and cost value of remaining inventory.

Some carryover is normal—core basics and transitional pieces can carry forward. Trend-driven or seasonal items remaining in significant quantities signal buying mistakes. Track carryover percentage by category to identify problem areas.

Compare carryover value to previous collections. Increasing carryover percentages suggest buying is outpacing demand, styles are missing the market, or markdown strategy needs adjustment.

Total collection profitability

The final scorecard: did this collection make money? Calculate total revenue minus cost of goods, shipping, returns processing, and markdown impact. This true profitability number tells you whether the collection succeeded regardless of how individual metrics looked.

Compare profitability across collections and across years. Are fall collections more profitable than spring? Are certain categories consistently profitable while others break even? These patterns should drive strategic decisions about where to invest.

Profitability per style reveals hidden insights. You might have one star performer generating 40% of collection profit while twenty other styles combine for the remaining 60%. Knowing this shapes future buying—maybe fewer styles with more depth in proven winners.

Comparing collections

Single collection analysis tells part of the story. Comparing across collections reveals patterns you’d otherwise miss.

Season-over-season comparison

Compare fall 2024 to fall 2023, not to spring 2024. Seasonal factors—weather, holidays, customer mindset—differ too much for cross-season comparison to be meaningful.

Track consistent metrics across seasons: week-one sell-through, mid-season margin realization, final sell-through, markdown depth, and profitability. Create a simple scorecard that lets you compare at a glance.

Identify improving trends versus declining trends. If sell-through improves each fall season, your buying is getting better. If margins decline each season, you’re becoming more discount-dependent. Both patterns demand attention.

Category performance trends

Some categories perform consistently well. Others struggle regardless of specific styles. Analyzing category performance across multiple collections reveals structural patterns.

If dresses underperform in every collection, maybe dresses aren’t right for your customer base. Or your dress selection process needs improvement. Or your dress merchandising fails to present them effectively. Consistent underperformance signals systematic issues.

Categories that improve collection over collection indicate learning. You’re getting better at selecting, pricing, or merchandising those items. Document what’s working and apply it elsewhere.

Building your collection scorecard

Create a standard template you use for every collection. Consistency enables comparison. Include these elements:

Collection overview: Season, number of styles, total units bought, total retail value, average price point.

Phase metrics: Week-one sell-through, week-eight sell-through, final sell-through. Full-price revenue percentage at each checkpoint.

Financial results: Total revenue, gross margin, markdown impact, return cost impact, final profitability.

Category breakdown: Same metrics broken down by major category.

Winner/loser analysis: Top 5 and bottom 5 styles with notes on why.

Lessons learned: What worked, what didn’t, what to do differently next time.

Complete this scorecard for every collection. After several seasons, you’ll have invaluable data for buying decisions, marketing planning, and strategic direction.

Frequently asked questions

How soon after launch should I worry about slow performance?

Week-one results warrant attention, not panic. Week-three results with no improvement warrant action. By week three, you have enough data to distinguish slow starters that will recover from genuine problems. If sell-through remains below 10% after three weeks with no upward trend, consider merchandising changes or early promotional attention.

Should I compare collection performance across different years?

Compare like seasons: spring to spring, fall to fall. Two to three years of comparison provides useful context. Beyond three years, business changes often make comparison less meaningful. Focus on identifying trends—are you improving, declining, or stable?

What’s more important: sell-through rate or margin?

Margin matters more for profitability. High sell-through achieved through deep discounting might move inventory but destroy profit. Aim for balance—strong sell-through at margin-preserving price points. If forced to choose, protect margin on core items and sacrifice it on trend pieces that won’t carry forward.

How do I account for external factors like weather or economy?

Document external factors when they occur, then reference when analyzing results. “Fall 2024 had unusually warm November, delayed outerwear sales” becomes context for interpreting that collection’s numbers. You can’t control external factors, but you can account for them when evaluating performance.

Peasy connects to Shopify, WooCommerce, and Google Analytics 4—delivering daily email reports with sales, orders, conversion rate, average order value, sessions, top products, top pages, and top channels—with comparisons showing today vs yesterday, this week vs last week, this month vs last month, and same periods last year. Try free for 14 days.